Posted by Jonathan J. Miller -Tuesday, February 7, 2012, 10:00 AM No Comments
A number of years ago, my appraisal firm provided an appraisal for the purchase of a few thousand square foot loft in a new gut rehab conversion in downtown Manhattan. This Inman article on “Homes were reptiles roam” triggered my memory of this story, of which the details are a little fuzzy due to the time that has passed. Still, it’s worth sharing since it’s so bizarre.
Our firm was served a subpoena indicating we complicit in the newly discovered “mold” problem in the condo unit. I should point out that the developer, bank, mortgage broker, real estate broker, attorneys on both sides and others were also subject to the same lawsuit.
We reviewed the appraisal and did not understand why the buyer was coming after all of us. The unit was gut renovated and never occupied at the time of the inspection. We did not observe anything unusual.
Our attorney called on our behalf and got the story. The case was soon thrown out before we had to provide anything. The story goes like this:
One night the owner was dining out and saw the adjacent table eating “turtle soup.”
The owner had an epiphany that his life’s work would be to “rescue” all the turtles he could get his hands on.
Soon there were a few thousand (my recollection) turtles living in the apartment with the heat kept warm enough to keep them thriving.
Mold began to grow within the apartment.
The owner claimed the unit was not livable due to the existence of mold and began to sue everyone connected with the sale.
The unit owner moved out and rented another apartment nearby and brought the turtles with him.
To be clear, Bill’s forecast is based on prices of the key housing indices i.e. Case Shiller and CoreLogic without seasonal or inflation adjustments. He is very clear about the definition of a housing bottom which is key to the argument – in fact, there are two housing bottoms:
First there are two bottoms for housing. The first is for new home sales, housing starts and residential investment. The second bottom is for prices. Sometimes these bottoms can happen years apart.
New Home Sales Bottomed in mid-2010 (moved sideways ever since).
Housing Prices Will Bottom Around March 2012 (will move sideways after that).
He provides a logical argument but I think he’s missing a key ingredient in the logic – how will the market be impacted by distressed properties and how they will impact the price trend:
Falling inventory is masking significant shadow inventory built-up during the credit crunch. Inventory is declining to more manageable levels, not because there are fewer homes to sell, but because sellers are holding back until conditions improve – big difference.
In other words, the call of a bottom is missing a huge element from the equation – supply. The forecast of a housing bottom could certainly be right in the short term, and housing prices could bottom in March temporarily, but there is a lot of excess supply to be dealt with and I suspect that prices will begin to slide as REO activity begins to slowly enter the market. It simply has to – there is too much of it.
No gloom and doom here, just that the market still has a lot of distressed inventory to absorb. Distressed real estate (foreclosure) volume has fallen by about one third in 2011 as lenders/servicers held back releasing more units into the market largely because of the “robo-signing” scandal in late 2010 and the potential AG settlement that has been languishing for much of the year.
The housing market got an REO reprieve in 2011 and has caused housing bulls to get ahead of themselves and the housing market, way too focused on demand, and not enough focus on supply.
Posted by Jonathan J. Miller -Monday, February 6, 2012, 5:00 PM 2 Comments
This was shared with me today via twitter @gabrielfreedom and it just clicked – the best explanation ever made for the various social media tools out there – using a sweeeeeeet analogy – donuts.
Posted by Jonathan J. Miller -Monday, February 6, 2012, 9:36 AM No Comments
So Clint Eastwood is one of my all-time favorite actors, most recently in Gran Torino (curiously a Ford), my wife’s family hails from Detroit and I’ve always wanted a car with a Hemi engine, but besides all that, this was my favorite commercial of the Superbowl.
I like the symbolism that the country needs to regroup and the game isn’t over yet (yes I realize that Fiat has a 58.5% ownership stake in Chrysler but please let me bask in the glow). A lot of negativity to churn through in the coming years because many people are hurting financially.
Posted by Jonathan J. Miller -Monday, February 6, 2012, 9:18 AM No Comments
Last week there was plenty of outrage from the directed at Freddie Mac who was found to have been betting against homeowners who were stuck with higher interest rates. They claimed there was a firewall and that they stopped the practice before FHFA, their regulator, told them to – but that wasn’t the point. It’s an unconscionable action from that institution.
FHFA, was once again late to the party (think housing boom and accounting scandal, of formerly named OFHEO). Now a government owned financial institution who is critical to the US housing mortgage market was betting against the US homeowner in conflict of their charter.
In President Obama’s SOTU speech, he announced creation of an office to prosecute those who violated the law related to the housing bubble. The initial reaction of many, including myself was “where were you 3 years ago?” as if this action was too late.
The Freddie Mac debacle and now the MERS lawsuit reestablishes that it is not too late. Without due process, faith in the US financial system will not be repaired.
Posted by Jonathan J. Miller -Monday, February 6, 2012, 6:30 AM No Comments
My friend Teri Rogers founder of BrickUnderground described by the New York Times (she used to write for their real estate section) as a provider of practical advice for apartment living in New York, pens a column in amNY. She reached out to me on the topic of valuing views and floor levels.
Posted by Jonathan J. Miller -Sunday, February 5, 2012, 3:32 PM 4 Comments
[Click top expand]
Last year I got an email from a Matrix reader, Ben Tanen, a former VC now running his own investment partnership that invests in public companies, with an interesting take on the buying power of gold as it relates to Manhattan apartments.
Like many things in my life, I let this “nugget” (sorry) slip through the cracks last year. He recently updated it with our new numbers in the recent release and it’s quite compelling.
The value of gold has risen sharply in recent years during the wobbling of the global financial markets – investors see precious metals like gold as a way of preserving purchasing power over the long run. In fact, in 2011, gold had more purchasing power relative to Manhattan real estate than at anytime during the past 22 years (the limit of our publicly released data).
It would take 908 ounces of gold to purchase the average Manhattan apartment versus the 1996 low point of 1,030 ounces, a point where many think our asset bubble problems began (stocks, then housing).
Posted by Jonathan J. Miller -Friday, February 3, 2012, 10:44 AM 1 Comment
Had a lot of fun with Tom Keene, Bloomberg’s editor-at-large, radio and TV anchor on his must watch show Midday Surveillance yesterday. Always flattering to be asked to guest co-host for the hour and a challenge to keep up with his fast paced wit. I’ve always felt that Bloomberg news, now with new emphasis on TV is business news the way it should be delivered – longer interviews and neutral presentations.
The show’s theme was housing and I felt compelled to give him more reasons to hand-wring about his upcoming apartment rent increase. Was fun to do.
The hour was divided into 4 segments, the last three with guests:
So Clint Eastwood is one of my all-time favorite actors, most recently in Gran Torino (curiously a Ford), my wife’s family hails from Detroit and I’ve always wanted a car with a Hemi engine, but besides all that, this was... Read More