<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Walk-through Walked Away, But Not Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://matrix.millersamuel.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://matrix.millersamuel.com/?p=851</link>
	<description>Interpreting the Real Estate Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 23:56:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Coruscation</title>
		<link>http://matrix.millersamuel.com/?p=851&#038;cpage=1#comment-28092</link>
		<dc:creator>Coruscation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matrix.millersamuel.com/?p=851#comment-28092</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just as theie real estate blog folds,
their Real Estate magazine spawns.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/pages/realestate/key/index.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as theie real estate blog folds,
their Real Estate magazine spawns.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/pages/realestate/key/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/pages/realestate/key/index.html</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Mattingly</title>
		<link>http://matrix.millersamuel.com/?p=851&#038;cpage=1#comment-28078</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Mattingly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matrix.millersamuel.com/?p=851#comment-28078</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting point by Larry C today (â€œThe Walk-thru was all over the place, it was not focused on NY, Brooklyn, LA. Why do I care what happened in Oregon last week? I had to skip through tons of crap to find the New York blogs.â€), which I think is true of the paper NYT newspaper coverage of real estate, as well.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am not talking so much about the articles that are explicitly about someplace other than NYC (as so many in The Times are). But when they do a â€œgeneralâ€ article about real estate practices or issues, they usually fail completely to provide the Manhattan-centric angle that (most of) their readers would want. For example, they will often refer to MLSs without noting that Manhattan does not have a MLS. So &quot;the point&quot; will have limited (or no) relevance to Manhattan.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But thatâ€™s another issue, for another medium. I hope they re-think the whole RE blog possibilities and try again in a few months. With their resources, it &lt;em&gt;should&lt;/em&gt; be terrific.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting point by Larry C today (â€œThe Walk-thru was all over the place, it was not focused on NY, Brooklyn, LA. Why do I care what happened in Oregon last week? I had to skip through tons of crap to find the New York blogs.â€), which I think is true of the paper NYT newspaper coverage of real estate, as well.</p>

<p>I am not talking so much about the articles that are explicitly about someplace other than NYC (as so many in The Times are). But when they do a â€œgeneralâ€ article about real estate practices or issues, they usually fail completely to provide the Manhattan-centric angle that (most of) their readers would want. For example, they will often refer to MLSs without noting that Manhattan does not have a MLS. So &#8220;the point&#8221; will have limited (or no) relevance to Manhattan.</p>

<p>But thatâ€™s another issue, for another medium. I hope they re-think the whole RE blog possibilities and try again in a few months. With their resources, it <em>should</em> be terrific.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Green</title>
		<link>http://matrix.millersamuel.com/?p=851&#038;cpage=1#comment-28062</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matrix.millersamuel.com/?p=851#comment-28062</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;One thing that the now-defunct blog did very well was link to third-party blogs for content and depth.  The writers understood their blogs place in the Blog Universe.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Months ago, Hot Property suffered from the same malaise as Damon, Joyce and the others.  Posts were sporadic and the content was numbing.  Lately, they&#039;ve improved on that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Big Media can blog, but they need to WANT to blog (and by &quot;they&quot; I mean the &lt;em&gt;writers&lt;/em&gt;, not the paper).  If the passion is lacking, the blog falls by the wayside.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As the author of this terrific blog, you should know that better than anybody.  If your heart&#039;s not in it, your readers will see that and probably never visit you again.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Successful bloggers exist as one of two characters: comprehensive aggregator of news found elsewhere, or provider of insightful opinion and rhetoric.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe &quot;incitefull&quot; is a better choice of words!  ;-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Farewell, The Walk-Through... We hardly knew ye.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that the now-defunct blog did very well was link to third-party blogs for content and depth.  The writers understood their blogs place in the Blog Universe.</p>

<p>Months ago, Hot Property suffered from the same malaise as Damon, Joyce and the others.  Posts were sporadic and the content was numbing.  Lately, they&#8217;ve improved on that.</p>

<p>Big Media can blog, but they need to WANT to blog (and by &#8220;they&#8221; I mean the <em>writers</em>, not the paper).  If the passion is lacking, the blog falls by the wayside.</p>

<p>As the author of this terrific blog, you should know that better than anybody.  If your heart&#8217;s not in it, your readers will see that and probably never visit you again.</p>

<p>Successful bloggers exist as one of two characters: comprehensive aggregator of news found elsewhere, or provider of insightful opinion and rhetoric.</p>

<p>Maybe &#8220;incitefull&#8221; is a better choice of words!  <img src='http://matrix.millersamuel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p>Farewell, The Walk-Through&#8230; We hardly knew ye.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry C</title>
		<link>http://matrix.millersamuel.com/?p=851&#038;cpage=1#comment-28043</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matrix.millersamuel.com/?p=851#comment-28043</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The blog failed because it didn&#039;t do what blogs are supposed to do, foster conversation amongst a community.  The Walk-thru was all over the place, it was not focused on NY, Brooklyn, LA.  Why do I care what happened in Oregon last week?  I had to skip through tons of crap to find the New York blogs.  And if you do make a blog national, you need to first speak to your local audience then shout out to everyone else.  Its so simple, they just overshot their load - they need to redo the blog in the same manner that they make the metro section, which is localized for Westchester, CT, Long Island, etc.  In Miami you don&#039;t get a metro section if you buy the Times.  That&#039;s all -&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blog failed because it didn&#8217;t do what blogs are supposed to do, foster conversation amongst a community.  The Walk-thru was all over the place, it was not focused on NY, Brooklyn, LA.  Why do I care what happened in Oregon last week?  I had to skip through tons of crap to find the New York blogs.  And if you do make a blog national, you need to first speak to your local audience then shout out to everyone else.  Its so simple, they just overshot their load &#8211; they need to redo the blog in the same manner that they make the metro section, which is localized for Westchester, CT, Long Island, etc.  In Miami you don&#8217;t get a metro section if you buy the Times.  That&#8217;s all -</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John K</title>
		<link>http://matrix.millersamuel.com/?p=851&#038;cpage=1#comment-27961</link>
		<dc:creator>John K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matrix.millersamuel.com/?p=851#comment-27961</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I thought it could have ended up being quite good, but the lack of posts hurt it, severely.  And, there wasn&#039;t much new news there, even though the Times must be sitting on &quot;gloms&quot; of stories, every day.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Joyce Cohen&#039;s blog could be fun and interesting, since she writes such a great article in each Sunday&#039;s Times, but she never updates it, making it worthless.  Well, she updates it, but mostly just to push her Sunday column.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it could have ended up being quite good, but the lack of posts hurt it, severely.  And, there wasn&#8217;t much new news there, even though the Times must be sitting on &#8220;gloms&#8221; of stories, every day.</p>

<p>Joyce Cohen&#8217;s blog could be fun and interesting, since she writes such a great article in each Sunday&#8217;s Times, but she never updates it, making it worthless.  Well, she updates it, but mostly just to push her Sunday column.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Mattingly</title>
		<link>http://matrix.millersamuel.com/?p=851&#038;cpage=1#comment-27954</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Mattingly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matrix.millersamuel.com/?p=851#comment-27954</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I donâ€™t remember the details of the different stages of The Walk Through; I just remember it all as being pretty lame. They took all the prestige of The Old Grey Lady to generate oodles of incoming links, then they pissed it all away.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No offense to the other nominees (&lt;em&gt;especially&lt;/em&gt; not you or Urban Digs) but when Inman nominated The Walk Through for â€˜most innovative blogâ€™ I thought they were just sucking up.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What a lost opportunity. They could have been a contender, but they threw it away -- without even the drama of Terry Malloy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I donâ€™t remember the details of the different stages of The Walk Through; I just remember it all as being pretty lame. They took all the prestige of The Old Grey Lady to generate oodles of incoming links, then they pissed it all away.</p>

<p>No offense to the other nominees (<em>especially</em> not you or Urban Digs) but when Inman nominated The Walk Through for â€˜most innovative blogâ€™ I thought they were just sucking up.</p>

<p>What a lost opportunity. They could have been a contender, but they threw it away &#8212; without even the drama of Terry Malloy.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
